<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oklahoma Switchgrass Going to New Biorefinery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thistulsa.com/2008/09/oklahoma-switchgrass-to-new-biorefinery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thistulsa.com/2008/09/oklahoma-switchgrass-to-new-biorefinery/</link>
	<description>a positive, personable experience of Tulsa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 05:45:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://thistulsa.com/2008/09/oklahoma-switchgrass-to-new-biorefinery/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thistulsa.com/?p=454#comment-288</guid>
		<description>I guess that I&#039;m still skeptical. From what I understand from the seminars I&#039;ve been to that even with the technology advancements that it takes 1.8 gallons of gasoline equivalent energy to produce 1 gallon of gasoline equivalent ethanol. So far this has just been a big tax deal. Hopefully they will get to the point where it pays off on an energy balance basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that I&#8217;m still skeptical. From what I understand from the seminars I&#8217;ve been to that even with the technology advancements that it takes 1.8 gallons of gasoline equivalent energy to produce 1 gallon of gasoline equivalent ethanol. So far this has just been a big tax deal. Hopefully they will get to the point where it pays off on an energy balance basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Quinnelly</title>
		<link>http://thistulsa.com/2008/09/oklahoma-switchgrass-to-new-biorefinery/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Quinnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thistulsa.com/?p=454#comment-275</guid>
		<description>@Carlos - I&#039;m not sure how much Tulsa is involved with this specific project, as the switchgrass fields are currently growing in the Oklahoma panhandle.

@riddle - Exactly...the cellulose version of ethanol is much better in my opinion than using all starch based products, and helps out by not utilizing something that we use as a food product to produce fuel with. Since cellulose is found in almost all plant life...it just makes more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Carlos/" rel="nofollow">@Carlos</a> &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure how much Tulsa is involved with this specific project, as the switchgrass fields are currently growing in the Oklahoma panhandle.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/riddle/" rel="nofollow">@riddle</a> &#8211; Exactly&#8230;the cellulose version of ethanol is much better in my opinion than using all starch based products, and helps out by not utilizing something that we use as a food product to produce fuel with. Since cellulose is found in almost all plant life&#8230;it just makes more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riddle</title>
		<link>http://thistulsa.com/2008/09/oklahoma-switchgrass-to-new-biorefinery/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>riddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thistulsa.com/?p=454#comment-269</guid>
		<description>i like the idea of switchgrass better than corn personally. Using food for fuel is a bad idea in my mind. Regardless of the kind of corn used, it&#039;s impact globally has been mixed at best. I think this is a step in the right direction.
thanks for the heads up Travis.

mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the idea of switchgrass better than corn personally. Using food for fuel is a bad idea in my mind. Regardless of the kind of corn used, it&#8217;s impact globally has been mixed at best. I think this is a step in the right direction.<br />
thanks for the heads up Travis.</p>
<p>mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos moreno</title>
		<link>http://thistulsa.com/2008/09/oklahoma-switchgrass-to-new-biorefinery/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos moreno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thistulsa.com/?p=454#comment-266</guid>
		<description>very glad to see that tulsa can play a part in providing creative/innovative new ways to provide us with sustainable forms of energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very glad to see that tulsa can play a part in providing creative/innovative new ways to provide us with sustainable forms of energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
